Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Weight-loss discipline try counted by the Fat loss Size of the Food Thinking Shot (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), comprised of 16 comments obtained toward a good six-area measure (never = 0/constantly = 5), which have high score exhibiting an advanced from controlled dining. Towards Consume psychometrical characteristics come across Garner ainsi que al. (1982). The fresh new feel coefficient for both trials, brand new North american country and you can German of them, is of the identical value, a leader away from 0.76.
Fat reduction discipline
Ineffectiveness measure. The fresh new bad apply at basis was estimated through the Ineffectiveness Measure away from the new Food Disorders Catalog (EDI) (Gather ainsi que al., 1983), which has illustrated a beneficial convergent authenticity (ineffectiveness/self-confidence ) off R = 0.70 (p
Scientific group grabbed the extra weight and height steps
Body mass index (BMI). Body mass index is determined once the pounds in the kilograms split up because of the top for the square yards (Bmi = kg/m2).
Ahead of data collection, a pilot study of the Silhouettes Size (Figure step 1), applied to an example including 20 North american country youngsters, was used to check on brand new appropriateness of the rates to help you depict human anatomy brands, to validate a acceptation out-of a not known set of silhouettes and an obvious comprehension of the new advice (the fresh Italian language category currently measured which have investigation contained in this respect). The outcomes displayed the fresh Silhouette Scale is actually a great otherwise a keen suitable appliance to the North american country attempt.
The newest investigators of the two regions, from the Mexico Town at Hae (standardized) procedure. Brand new forms were placed on sets of scientific and you can breastfeeding students from the North american country and German universities. A primary reason trailing brand new ples out-of students related to medication try only the attract one to (you can imagine) these young adults need to have on medical field and also for health conditions, causing them to significantly more attentive to dilemmas eg ED. Informed agree try obtained from all of the research people. All the contacted people accessible to participate. The fresh respective regional stability committees approved the fresh new non-intrusive procedure. Top-notch translators undertook and you will controlled the fresh new translation and por quГ© las mujeres venezolano son tan bellezfiul you can retranslation of instruments.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for